QuicksearchGoogle the SiteCC Licensesupersized.org |
Friday, September 21. 2007How are Microsoft backdoors news?Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Why would MS risk its reputation just to install a back door on its costumers' computers? Because Microsoft understands its reputation (such as it is) won't suffer from this, and because Microsoft products have never sold on the basis of a reputation for probity and security, but rather in despite of them. Either you install binary, opaque patches every few days, or you run unpatched. Microsoft can send backdoor patches to an individual, a company, a country, or the whole world. We didn't need the Auto Update story to know this. This is something that should be incorporated into Microsoft's reputation from day one. (The same goes for other non-free OSs too, of course.) As for why they would do this, I could suggest a desire to control everyone's PCs for purposes of WGA/activation/DRM/TCPA/killing undesirable (competing) software or hardware. Or pressure put on them by 'security agencies' and law enforcement. But this story teaches us the most trivial reasons are also the most common: expediency and disregard for user desires, preferences and legal rights. |
Tagged entriesArchivesThis Entry's LinksReferring links
|